![]() ![]() The consensus was that in the line-up of totalitarian dictators, Hitler was the one with charisma. ![]() As for physical attributes, his short stature, pockmarked face and damaged arm were frequently noted. Scholars who had to wade through the turgid prose of his theoretical writings concluded that Stalin was poorly educated and probably not too bright, except as a backroom organiser. But the ‘grey blur’ remained, no doubt partly in reaction against devotional Soviet characterisations of the Great Leader, Teacher and Father of Peoples. There was one notable exception among the scholars: Robert Tucker put a dashing young revolutionary – someone who might have stepped out of the Baader-Meinhof Group or the Weathermen – on the cover of Stalin as Revolutionary (1973). These must be among the most misleading descriptions ever to capture the fancy of generations of historians. Trotsky thought him a faceless ‘creature of the bureaucracy’, even in power. Stalin was a ‘grey blur’ in the opinion of Nikolai Sukhanov, the Menshevik-Internationalist chronicler of the Russian Revolution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |